Imaginary Friend

In a research paper published earlier this year, a team of psychologists reported a study in which 39 children (from Belfast, as it happens) were each given a challenging game to play. They had been split into three groups: in one, each child played with an adult present; in the second, they played alone; and in the third, they were told that they were being watched by the invisible “Princess Alice”.

AliceIn order to do well at the game, it was actually necessary to cheat, to break the rules. As you might expect, the children who thought that nobody was watching cheated most, and those watched by an adult cheated least. Those who had been told they were in the presence of Princess Alice averaged in between; but on further investigation the researchers found that this group was composed of two sets: the children who believed that Princess Alice was real, and those who didn’t.

The behaviour of the believers was exactly the same as that of the children who were supervised by a real, non-invisible adult.

The conclusion is almost too obvious to require pointing out. If you believe that an invisible being is observing your every move, you won’t cheat; your behavior will be more moral.

The senior researcher in this experiment was Jesse Bering, author of The God Instinct (The Belief Instinct in the USA). The main theme of the book is Bering’s hypothesis that religious belief is “adaptive”, that is, it’s something which gives an evolutionary advantage, and thus tends to spread in a human population. In this, he is directly in conflict with Richard Dawkins, who suggests in The God Delusion that instinct for religion is a mere by-product of the evolution of the human mind.

I’ve argued the latter point myself. It seems to me that there are two obvious features of human cognition that might be enough to create religion. First, as social animals, humans need to understand “agency” — who did that? why did he do it? what was in his mind? — and have a tendency to over-apply the concept to, say, natural phemomena — God did it. Secondly, the human brain is fantastically tuned to detecting patterns, both in time and space. Even, sometimes, patterns that aren’t really there. “Every time I wear my lucky socks, we win the game.”

I have to admit, though, that Bering’s point of view is better-argued and supported by research and experiment, rather than Dawkins’ vague appeal to things that “make sense” (as I did in the last paragraph). The idea that religious early cultures out-competed non-religious ones through enhanced cooperation and lower numbers of “cheaters” has not been proven, but it’s certainly a possibility.

But atheists like myself (and Dawkins, and Bering) have an instinct to be moral too. Even if a moral culture really is more successful than a purely selfish one, there’s no actual need for the religious aspects to enter into it. The way evolution works though, is that some pre-existing feature always undergoes a mutation or modification that gives a reproductive advantage, or an environmental change makes it so.

So I think they both could be right. Religion might have been an inherent quirk of human cognition which only became evolutionarily adaptive once societies grew beyond a certain size or complexity. But after that, as communication, education, democracy and justice developed, religion lost its evolutionary advantage again. Now it’s just useless.


One thought on “Imaginary Friend

  1. Dear friend
    I think that so many people are putting so much energy into disproving the existence of Intelligence.
    What they are doing is simply negating there own intelligence.
    Atheism is a neccessary intermediary step between immature belief or misconception of the higher consciousness and that which our evolved intelligence enables us to deduce and ultimately perceive of that organising principle or Intelligence. Forget the words and ideas of the past and ancients, and simply open your mind to reality and the needs of our age…apply your minds to solving the problems facing mankind, make peoples lives better and end the perpetual cycle of suffering and division, those animalistic tendencies which we are trying to transcend. We need to recognise a oneness that will help us to stop hating and killing others because they are different. We need to practise virtue because this brings people together and results in harmonious relationships…just mentioning a few things.
    Its so funny the way atheists say theres no God. Ask them to define what is this God that they are working so desperately adn feverishly to prove does not exist…they do not have a definition of what is God, who or where or when, they have antiquated outmoded human conceptions… think about it… there are probably 5000 different definitions of God, there are probably 5billion different personal conceptions of that higher being or reality, which one are you proving does not exist… all of them, some of them, one of them. Whichever way they answer they have proven themselves to be merely a pseudo scientific quasi intellectual delighting in creating scepticism, when the world needs unity, love and peace. Take a truly scientific approach to the question, do real research, understand the real dynamics behind genetic modification at the micrscopic level and look at the perfect adaptation of every organism to its environment and fellow creatures than claim that there is no intelligence…and explain all you theories and hypothesis to a goat and wait for him to answer. The answer that the goat gives you will startle you because it will show that the goat has not understood you and is not able to make intelligent conversation with you…and there is a certain barrier to its intelligence and capabilities, and then ponder what would it take to enable the goat to transcend its current position and to realise an entirely higher mode of awareness, intelligence and communication…and whether those factors are simply material and simply natural to the chemical environment. The one thing you cannot speculate your way around is that a cloud of hydrogen has no survival selection that would cause it to evolve into a goat… there is an organising principle and intelligence inherent!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s